Difference in noise levels between e-cars and combustion vehicles
Electric cars stay atop in noise duel at traffic lights
Empa and the Touring Club Switzerland (TCS) have, for the first time, conducted a joint research project. The study set out to investigate how the noise levels of electric cars and cars with combustion engines differ. While hardly any differences can be detected at constant speed, e-cars are significantly quieter when accelerating.

If more and more electric vehicles are on our roads, this will not only have a positive impact on the climate and air quality, but also on traffic noise. The extent to which the noise levels of electric vehicles and cars with combustion engines differ has not yet been systematically investigated. Empa and TCS have carried out an extensive research project in close cooperation to find out how the noise levels of comparable cars with different drive systems differ depending on the driving style.
Nine pairs of cars in direct comparison

At the TCS Stockental driving center, Empa and TCS compared nine pairs of cars from different categories – from the Peugeot (e)-208 to the VW ID.Buzz and its combustion counterpart, the VW Multivan. The experts took various acoustic measurements on the roughly 100-meter test track and examined the noise levels at constant speed and during acceleration. For this purpose, Empa researchers developed new sensor modules that were mounted on the test vehicles and enabled the test drivers to complete various driving profiles precisely and repeatably.
Major differences during acceleration
The team found that electric cars are significantly quieter than their combustion engine counterparts, particularly when accelerating. Especially when accelerating below 40 kilometers per hour, for instance, when starting at traffic lights, the noise levels of electric cars are significantly lower on average. Depending on the pair of cars, the difference is more than three decibels, which corresponds to a halving of the sound intensity. The difference between the drive types increases significantly with increasing acceleration: The greater the acceleration and the lower the speed, the louder the combustion engine is compared to the electric car.
The results were different, however, when driving at constant speeds of between 30 and 60 kilometers per hour, i.e. at typical inner-city speed: There were no significant noise differences on average between electric cars and cars with combustion engines, as tire noise dominates and drowns out the engine noise.
Successful collaboration between Empa and TCS
For Sascha Grunder, Head of Test & Technology at TCS, the study revealed important findings: "With this detailed study, we have broken new ground and have shown that electric cars are quieter than combustion engines, especially at low speeds and high acceleration. For TCS, it was a privilege to work together with Empa's scientists and provide the Empa acoustics lab with real data for the first time."
Reto Pieren from Empa's Acoustics/Noise Control lab agrees: "The results are an important contribution to noise research and show that e-mobility contributes to noise reduction in urban environments. The collaboration with TCS was enriching, and I look forward to continuing it."
The results of the study will be presented at the international scientific conference Forum Acusticum in Malaga. The study also forms the basis for further research projects. The researchers will continue to evaluate and analyze the measurement data until the end of 2025. In a next step, Empa and TCS want to jointly investigate the influence of the tire type and the road surface properties on the noise level. These investigations will take place in spring 2026, and the results are expected to be published at the end of next year.
Dr. Reto Pieren
Laboratory for Acoustics / Noise Control
Phone +41 58 765 60 31
Images in high resolution can be downloaded here.
Engineering the future Matthias Sulzer is Head of Empa's Engineering Sciences Department. He is convinced that research and industry mutually benefit each other – a principle that he has lived by throughout his career in both "worlds". |
Ultra-thin yet strong against noise
A filigree sound absorber for all weathers
Empa researchers have developed innovative sound absorbers made of mineral foams. Not only are they significantly thinner than conventional materials, they can also be designed specifically for different frequencies. They have now been tested for the first time in a driveway in the city of Zurich to dampen street noise.

In the fight against noise, every centimeter counts in the construction sector. Traditional sound absorbers are usually made of bulky materials such as rock wool or melamine foam, however. In order to effectively dampen even low sound frequencies, thick layers of insulation materials are required – which costs space, restricts design and is often simply not even feasible in outdoor areas. Together with the company de Cavis, Empa researchers have therefore developed ultra-thin sound absorbers made of mineral gypsum or cement foams. These are just as effective as conventional absorbers, but around four times thinner. Further advantages: The foams can be tuned to specific frequency ranges and are easy to cut and install. Made from plaster or cement, they can be fireproof and recyclable, and do not release any harmful particles. Cement foams are also weatherproof and therefore suitable for outdoor use.
A labyrinth for sound waves

According to Empa researcher Bart Van Damme, the high sound absorption despite the low thickness is based on a patented design: “The varying pore structure of the mineral foams forces air particles to take a longer route to get into the material and out again. Despite the low thickness, this creates the impression of a much thicker absorber for the sound waves.” The decisive factor here is having the largest possible pores with the thinnest possible pore walls. The researchers from Empa's Acoustics/Noise Reduction lab use several porous layers for the new type of sound absorber. They not only vary the thickness of the individual layers and the size of the pores but also provide them with tiny holes. While the foams, which have a pore content of over 90 percent, can be produced from plaster or cement using established processes, perforation is currently still done by hand.
The researchers also used a numerical model to simulate how air flows through the pores of the mineral foams at the smallest level. “We can thus simulate and even specifically influence the acoustic behavior of the entire material by varying pore size, perforation and layer structure,” says Van Damme.
Tailor-made instead of bulky
Traffic noise is typically in the range between 500 and 1000 Hertz. Model calculations show that four coordinated layers of fine-pored mineral foam with a total thickness of around 5.5 centimeters are sufficient as insulation material for this frequency range. An initial prototype with a total area of twelve square meters has already been tested in a driveway together with the city of Zurich. In the preliminary simulation of the driveway, the researchers optimized the arrangement of the individual panels on the walls. Controlled measurements on site confirmed the predictions: The noise level dropped by up to 4 decibels thanks to the 72 panels. The effect was particularly noticeable for passing cars approaching or leaving the driveway, as the sound is reflected several times by the panels on the way into the courtyard.
A comparison with conventional rock wool showed that the new absorbers are more reliable at low frequencies and slightly less efficient at higher frequencies – but still reduce sound transmission in the area of peak absorption. “Even an installation as compact as the one in the driveway significantly reduces noise,” concludes Van Damme.

Predestined for special applications
In future, the mineral sound absorbers could be retrofitted in driveways, under balconies or on façades in noisy streets. As with all open-pored absorbers, the prerequisite is protection from the weather and from dirt, for example with a perforated top layer. “Ideally, absorbers are already taken into account in the architectural design of new buildings,” explains Van Damme. The elements can also be easily integrated into stairwells or large interior spaces such as offices, canteens or sports halls – also from a design perspective, as the porous mineral foam is made of the same material as the surfaces of the walls.
According to Bart Van Damme, the idea for the absorber originated several years ago. However, the breakthrough only came through the combination of material development and acoustic modeling as part of an Innosuisse project. Thanks to the modeling, the absorber can now be flexibly customized: Should it dampen particularly low tones, such as in large halls? Or should it be more effective in the mid-range, such as in traffic noise, offices or classrooms?
At the moment, production is still complex and partly done by hand. Together with a suitable industrial partner, the material is now to be further developed and produced on a larger scale. The potential is huge – especially for special applications where limited space, fire protection and design requirements have to be taken into account at the same time.
Surfaces and Interfaces
Focusing on people: In the Research Focus Area Health, Empa researchers are developing pioneering solutions for the medicine of tomorrow – precisely where “conventional” materials meet living ones, i.e. cells and tissue. There are polymers that light up when there is an infection with certain germs, tiny gold particles against cancer or “nanozymes” that help mothers with complications during pregnancy without harming the foetus – and much more.
Read the latest EmpaQuarterly online or download the PDF version.